How Islam Is Different, and Why It Matters
In 630AD, at the Battle of Awtas, Muslim forces, numbering some twelve thousand or so, engaged a coalition formed to oppose the militaristic expansion of Islam. The outcome of the battle was decisive in favor of the Muslims. As part of the spoils of war, a number of women were captured.
Muhammad took this opportunity to instruct his followers in the specifics of what may or may not be done to female captives. In short: He advised that female captives may be raped in front of their husbands.
Abu Sa’id Al Khudri said “The Apostle of Allaah sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of Apostle of Allaah were reluctant to have relations with the female captives because of their pagan husbands. So, Allaah the exalted sent down the Qur’anic verse “And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hand posses.” This is to say that they are lawful for them when they complete their waiting period.
— Sunan Abi Dawud 2155
On another occasion, Muhammad advised more specifically how female captives should be raped (i.e., he advised against 'coitus interruptus'):
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:
that while he was sitting with Allah's Apostle he said, "O Allah's Apostle! We get female captives as our share of booty, and we are interested in their prices, what is your opinion about coitus interrupt us?" The Prophet said, "Do you really do that? It is better for you not to do it. No soul that which Allah has destined to exist, but will surely come into existence.
— Bukhari 34:432
It should be further noted that the impetus for this inquiry from Muhammad's followers was a desire not to devalue their female captives by getting them pregnant. There was absolutely no concern shown for female captives by Muhammad or by his followers, except where 'resale value' as a slave was concerned. Muslims would often rape women and then sell them into slavery.
Rape is not so much an incident of Islam as it is an objective and a tactic of Islam. There is even a term for this: "rape jihad". Muslims realized long ago that the future of a nation lies in the wombs of its women. In order to ensure Muslim supremacy, Muslims rape nonMuslims as an act of conquest.
Today, we see this primarily in the so-called "grooming scandals" across Europe (and, now, even in the US). The term "grooming", however, is inadequate; what we face is an epidemic of pedophilic rape (often gang rape). Muslims are routinely raping young White girls as part of their conquest of the West, and we are doing nothing to stop them.
Apologists for Islam will say that those who commit these acts are not 'true Muslims' or that they are 'extremists' or 'Islamists' (or whatever the term du jure happens ot be). The Soviets had a term for such persons: "useful idiot". There are two kinds of Muslims: the 'extremist' who follows Islam and the 'moderate' who supports the extremist.
There is no such thing as a good Muslim.
A man may be a good man and a bad Muslim or a good Muslim and a bad man. The set of good men who are good Muslims is null. That we allow the importation of millions of these inhuman monsters into the West is a resounding indictment of our moral and physical torpor. Our sons and daughters will pay the price for our folly.
Muhammad was a bloodthirsty warlord, a cruel slaver, a brutal rapist, and an inveterate pedophile. Muslims consider him to be the perfect man. Muhammad beat his wives, raped his slaves, married his own daughter-in-law, killed prisoners of war, beat children, promoted pedophilia, and 'married' a nine-year-old. Muslims consider him to be the perfect man.
Indeed in the Messenger of Allah (Muhammad) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allah and the Last Day and remembers Allah much.
— Quran 33:21
Islam is not merely wrong, but, rather, it is actively evil. There can be no peace between Muslims and any others. Muslims believe that they have been told by Allah to subdue the world by the sword and exterminate those who will not submit. The Muslim is, in the truest and strongest sense, a hostis humani generis.
Instead of seeking understanding (impossible) or coexistence (impossible) or reform (impossible), we should be seeking the complete and total expulsion of Muslims from the West and the extirpation of all traces of Islam. In the end analysis, every Muslim is an enemy soldier and every mosque is an enemy base. We cannot in good conscience or in good faith continue to fail to address the rising tide of Islam and the threat it poses to every civilized person on this planet.
As Islam is evil, so Muslims are evil. We must not remain silent in the face of evil, for to do so is evil itself. The future of humanity hangs in the balance.
And the arrest, prosecution, and public execution of those who incentivized and facilitated (and who are still incentivizing and facilitating) the importation of Muslims into the West. ↩︎